Get real C_DBADM_2601 exam questions for better preparation

A regional food distribution company performs a recovery readiness exercise for its SAP HANA system before a seasonal ordering peak. The backup catalog shows the latest backup as complete, but the recovery checklist references an older backup point from the previous exercise. The operations team asks whether the exercise can be signed off because the latest backup itself completed successfully.
The constraint is that the recovery readiness record must demonstrate alignment between the selected recovery point, available backup evidence, and the intended exercise objective. The sign-off cannot rely on unrelated historical checklist entries.
Which action should the administrator take?

• A. Use the older backup point because it was already referenced in the previous recovery exercise.
• B. Sign off the exercise because the latest backup completed successfully.
• C. Update the checklist to reference the current validated recovery point and confirm that it aligns with the available backup evidence before sign-off.
• D. Create a new checklist entry after the seasonal peak to avoid delaying current operations.

CHALLENGE 2 - Maintenance Simulation Monitoring Baseline
The database team can tune workload-related settings now to improve patient-flow analytics or preserve monitoring evidence first and tune only if current evidence supports it. Which option best balances performance and evidence quality?

• A. Replace monitoring review with clinical operations feedback because the dashboard is business-facing.
• B. Preserve baseline monitoring evidence first, then approve tuning if current evidence supports it.
• C. Tune now and use the improved response time as the main readiness measure.
• D. Reject all tuning until the SAP HANA Cloud migration phase begins.

CHALLENGE 3 - Cloud Planning Evidence Separation
The modernization lead wants to include the SAP HANA Cloud environment in the same readiness status as the first close systems because the cloud database is provisioned and has limited reporting data. The cloud evidence package does not include matching monitoring or recovery validation. What is the best response?

• A. Keep cloud planning evidence separate until cloud-specific monitoring and recovery evidence are available.
• B. Use the upgraded on-premises system's close evidence as the SAP HANA Cloud readiness record.
• C. Include the cloud database in the same status because provisioning and limited data prove readiness.
• D. Stop cloud transition planning until the current close system is fully retired.

A regional insurance claims processor runs SAP HANA for daily operational reporting. After a scheduled workload increase, SAP HANA cockpit shows higher memory usage and slower report response times. The alert list shows a threshold warning, but the operations note only records that reports are "slow." A support analyst proposes increasing the threshold so the warning no longer appears.
The constraint is that the administrator must determine whether the warning represents a real workload pattern requiring follow-up or only an alert configuration mismatch. The response must preserve monitoring usefulness for future workload changes.
Which action best addresses the monitoring issue?

• A. Increase the alert threshold immediately because users already reported slow response times.
• B. Restart the database so memory usage returns to normal before the next reporting cycle.
• C. Disable the alert temporarily so operational reports can continue without monitoring noise.
• D. Correlate the alert timing with workload and memory behavior, update the monitoring evidence, and adjust thresholds only if the observed baseline supports it.

CHALLENGE 3 - Freight Cloud Readiness Boundary
The executive update needs to cover current cutover readiness and future SAP HANA Cloud reporting migration. The on-premises cutover systems have backup and monitoring evidence, while the cloud database has provisioning and sample data only. Which action best supports accurate decision-making?

• A. Delay cutover approval until SAP HANA Cloud carries the same freight reporting workload.
• B. Combine all evidence into one readiness status so the executive update is easier to read.
• C. Treat cloud provisioning as proof that the migration stream is ready for reporting transition.
• D. Separate current cutover readiness from SAP HANA Cloud migration readiness in the update.